ralphpnj wrote: > Why is that in every field of science and technology objective research > is welcomed and given the utmost respect but in audio (by "audio" I am > referring to the use of technology to reproduce sound and music) the > objective approach is considered (at least by you) as irrational?
jkeny wrote: > I'm still trying to organise the test but not on this forum - as this > section is unmoderated & populated by trolls - an example being the > immediately posted bullshit from ralphpnj - complete waste of time > bull·shit > ˈbo͝olˌSHit/ > vulgar slang > noun > noun: bullshit > > 1. > stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense. So exactly what part of my post (quoted above) is bullshit? Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103950
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
