pablolie wrote: > So if 90% of people were to admit they can't hear a difference no matter > how hard they try, the best thing is to listen to the 10% who can, and > if 6 of them get lucky, we've proven it's possible to tell a difference? > :-)
Well .. yes .. for the parameters of the study. Assuming they get lucky often enough to beat pure chance. In that case it seems likely that either they *can* tell the difference in this trial or the trial is broken. But like all hypotheses, you only need to find -one- person who can consistently tell the difference and you have disproved the theory that "no-one can tell the difference".. the debate then moves on to the technicalia of the test itself .... The debate will live forever. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
