Julf wrote: > Reading that makes me happy - have seen too many "why keep ranting about > all that double blind stuff, nobody will change their mind anyway" > comments lately...
I am equally delighted to ascribe differences between *-different-* versions of an original recording to mastering issues, and have also made it clear that I am sceptical about the provenance of many so-called "Hi-Res" recordings presented in a larger PCM box than 16bit/44.1kHz. I remain open-minded about the potential of such PCM formats themselves, although I can recognise that this is a minority position on this forum... What I remain unable to account for is my persistent & increasing perception that the musical quality of the *-same-* versions of original recordings has improved since I reorganised the way that my Transporter output is processed in my own music system. *-That-* is what my proposed double-blind ABX test is designed to investigate. Just so we're clear. Dave :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
