On 20/04/2016 10:23 PM, Roger.D wrote:
Dear Justin
What a  nonsense that the CASA inspector(s) foisted on you.

That's an incorrect assumption that CASA were involved in this at any point.

If you read
the TCDS for the Standard Jantar 2 and the TCDS for the Standard Jantar
3 then it is clear at point 8 "Operational Capability" that these
sailplanes are rated for "VFR Day", and below that "Cloud flying" which
is why a T&S (as a minimal capability piece of equipment for blind
flying) has to be included in the standard equipment list.  Since we are
not permitted here to cloud fly and have such a placard in the cockpit,
a T&S is not relevant to being mandatory standard equipment.

We don't get to pick and choose how we interpret "relevant" rules when we don't like one that is not in our favour. I looked through at least another dozen gliders of varying age. All state cloud flying permitted, none, other than PZL require a T&B. Similarly, where specialised equipment for a task is needed (think G-meters and Aerobatics), they are listed separately in the TCDS - see the K21 as an example. PZL dropped that from the list in their most recent models of the 55 and Perkoz.

I agree that the requirement for T&B for the MEL is silly, that's why I felt like it was worth sharing the story. Here's an example of some of the crazy paperwork that does exist out there, and we managed to find a decent workaround for it. It's also a cautionary tale about making sure that inspectors _actually_ read their paperwork that they claim to be signing off, rather than just waving their hands and saying "yeah I know what's written, I've done this a hundred times" that can be applied in many different situations.

--
Justin Couch                                 http://www.vlc.com.au/
Java 3D Graphics Information                    http://www.j3d.org/
LinkedIn                     http://au.linkedin.com/in/justincouch/
G+                                                       WetMorgoth
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Look through the lens, and the light breaks down into many lights.
 Turn it or move it, and a new set of arrangements appears... is it
 a single light or many lights, lights that one must know how to
 distinguish, recognise and appreciate? Is it one light with many
 frames or one frame for many lights?"      -Subcomandante Marcos
-------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to