Thanks Jo,

You are however wrong when you say "This will not directly affect all glider pilots"

CASA option 4 Extend the RAMPC so it applies more widely in the sport aviation sector as well. CASA option 5 Develop a new certification standard for the sport and recreational sectors.
CASA option 6 Mitigate the risk of change by applying operational restrictions.

The current gliding self declaration medical could disappear under option 4. The RAMPC is the Recreational Aviation Medical Practitioner's Certificate aka the "Driver's Licence medical". It is actually the Heavy Vehicle driver's licence standard and has exactly the same medical standards as the Class 2 aviation medical for a PPL plus some other restrictions but done by a GP.
Likewise Option 5.
Option 6 could also raise issues for gliding.

I suspect Carmody (current temporary boss of CASA) doesn't realise that gliding currently has a self declaration medical just like the USA for glider and motorglider licences. RAAus requires you to have a medically unrestricted State driver's licence for ordinary cars. On any reasonable risk analysis you are far more likely to kill or injure third parties or other road/airspace users due to sudden incapacitation (which a Class 2 or Class 1 medical aren't guaranteed to pick up anyway) while driving your car than while flying a private aircraft.


My recommendation is to support the AOPA proposal which is pretty much the same as that adopted by the UK CAA last year. This would make it cheaper and easier for tug pilots to keep flying. I know of at least one tuggie who gave up because of the expense and hassle of the medical.

AOPA made their proposal last year to CASA and the Minister. The CASA paper looks to me like a typical bureaucratic response when the intention is to do nothing. Instead of simply discussing the AOPA proposal it puts ALL medical certification on the table which is guaranteed to draw out the process ad infinitum as people argue about minor details of everything.

If you respond (and you should) send in your response to CASA and also to your local Federal member, State Senators and the Minister, Darren Chester. Also politely express your displeasure at this attempted CASA obfuscation.

Mike






At 09:05 AM 2/18/2017, you wrote:
CASA has invited discussion on Medicals. This will not directly affect all glider pilots, but could affect tug pilots in some way. Anyone can have input, not just pilots. Regarding Class 2 Medical reform, AOPA put forward a proposal on 23 August 2016 which you may wish to support (2 page summary CASA discussion paper and AOPO recommendation attached). Possibilities include addressing each of the 6 options put forward by CASA, or simply stating that "the AOPO proposal dated 23 August 2016 regarding Class 2 Medical reform is supported by me". Submissions to <mailto:av...@casa.gov.au>av...@casa.gov.au are due by 30 March 17 and should include in the subject line: 'AvMed discussion paper'.



_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to