+1

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 07:22, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> -1
>
> Middle of October 2010, I used much time trying to figure out what
> LibreOffice (LO) was about. I found the site at the time almost useless in
> this regard. What I hoped to find was an explanation as to how the products
> differ in a way that matters to a user. The site was sufficiently vague that
> I finally sent a personal email to Thorsten Behrens. I formulated my
> opinions and limited understanding based on clarifications from Thorsten (to
> whom I am thankful for taking the time).
>
> I will say that I lack the time to pursue an OOo vs LibreOffice debate. At
> least for now, I will state that I believe that the products are
> sufficiently similar that documentation can be done jointly at this
> particular point in time. Now, for a few concerns:
>
>
> Concern 1:
> I interpret a portion of this message to say that the LibreOffice folks
> desire no association with the OOo name. I start wondering if LibreOffice
> will port future OOo changes and if they will forge a different path
> yielding a different product (or if they will stay as a rebranded OOo with
> added value). Depending on the intent, in the near future it may not be
> possible to have a common set of documentation.
>
> Concern 2:
> If we change the name to use ODF, then (1) the name no longer contains any
> association to the products about which the documentation is written, (2)
> other products use ODF, and (3) the documentation site is not about ODF.
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> I read the message below to say "we will host you if (and only if) you drop
> name association with OOo". I am against changing the name before we
> understand what OOoDev intends to do. Will OOoDev jump on the LibreOffice
> bandwagon and change their name accordingly (LoDev??)? If OOoDev intends to
> become ODFDev then that would be a more compelling reason to use the ODF
> name
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/17/2010 04:02 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
>
>> As many of you know, we have had some problems with website downtime and
>> slow connections. Most of you don't know that Andreas, our system
>> administrator, has been having difficulty upgrading the site to Plone 4,
>> due to lack of server space and the slow, unreliable connection. Because
>> of these problems, we have been looking for alternative places to host
>> the site. Our choices are limited because most commercial hosts do not
>> accept Plone sites because of the resources they use.
>>
>> Andreas suggested the German association OOoDeV might host the site.
>> OOoDeV has now formally offered to host our website, but only if our
>> domain&  site names do not include OOo or OpenOffice. (OOoDeV hosts The
>> Document Foundation/LibreOffice. I assume they are going to change their
>> name, too.)
>>
>> (Related info: Some weeks ago, we invited the LibreOffice docs team to
>> use our website. They have not accepted this offer (in part because of
>> the site name), but the possibility exists for them or other related
>> documentation groups to do so. A minor name change would make this
>> arrangement more attractive.)
>>
>> I propose to change the domain and site names of OOoAuthors to the more
>> generic ODFAuthors, where ODF = OpenDocument Format. I have already
>> registered the domain name to prevent anyone else from grabbing it.
>>
>> I also propose to accept the offer from OOoDeV to host the site. This
>> will allow Andreas and others to administer it more efficiently.
>>
>> Please respond to this note with +1 or discussion about the proposals.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> --Jean
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
> --
> Andrew Pitonyak
> My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
> Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
fotis gkouzkouris
web: fogkou.com

Reply via email to