I realize I'm coming in late. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 21:54, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
>> Firstly, we are doing documentation on OOo, not ODF in general. > We are now, but why limit ourselves for the future? > ODF (OpenDocument Format) covers both, and other products as well. Those other products being: * OOo; * OOo4Kids; * OOoLight; * BrOffice; * OxygenOffice; * LibreOffice; * NeoOffice; * PortableOOo (? The portable version of OOo); In my rewriting of _OOo in a multi-lingual environment_, I've discovered a number of small, but significant differences between the first six programs. I don't have the hardware/software required to run the last two. Going by what I've read, I think that the latter two also have small but significant differences from the others. As such, I think that ODFAuthors more accurately reflects the range of software that the documentation produced by this group currently covers, than OOoAuthors does. jonathon -- Personal email to this account is automatically forwarded to Dave Null, and goes unread by any human. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
