Leo Simons wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 19:13, Stephen McConnell wrote:Because its less ambiguous.
Following from Berin's reuest, I've drafted up a legalistic proposal relating to the ponts abput PMC voting procedures.
do we need that? Why?
Keep in mind that legalistic prose basically the application of SOC on natural language. A reduction in ambiguity comes at the expense of having to work harder to read the document.
:-)
Cheers Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
