On 5/25/2010 1:55 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >>> I don't know, but regardless there are always at least 5 of >>> those, is what I'm saying. >> >> But are they the same 5? If you simply can't transfer the amount >> of data you have there's not much it can do but pick up where it >> left off when wakes up outside of a blackout again. As long as it >> isn't the same jobs being missed repeatedly, it is probably going >> to the to it as fast as you would if you adjust the schedule >> anyway. > > It should take about 4 days to do all the jobs. There's one job > that is 10 days old. Therefore I conclude that it's not doing the > right thing. :)
OK, agreed, but did you mention having some sort of custom lock that limits concurrency? If that looks like a failure the job probably goes to the bottom of the list - and at startup, you would probably always fail most of the oldest jobs that try to start. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/