On March 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Technically, `To: <foo>' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> > `To: foo' or `To: bla <foo>'.
> >
> > Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> > what you accept, and so on...
>
> Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
> 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)'.
>
> norbert.
Hmm. This is probably all a side effect of BBDB implementing its own
address parsing, which may or may not be a good idea. The problem
being that mail-extr doesn't always return a useful value either. It
is, however, poor behaviour for BBDB to whine about this stuff; if it
gets past the MUA, BBDB should be able to make a reasonable stab at
parsing it.
For the mean time, you can get around stuff like this by modifying
bbdb-extract-address-components-regexp to cope with the bogus
addresses.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
