Hugh, Alan, Gil and Chris Thank you for your thoughts and suggestions. I see the value in Hugh and Alans approaches and will work with them and see what I can do with them. Gils comments on 'unknowing messing around' are true to a point however dowsing and a radionics box could do some wild things. The uniqueness I see is in the original mixing for a specific task. This was a question that needed to be asked publically for the community to consider. While I have made general mixes of things, with our 'personal clients' the mixes are most often specific for the situation, time and weather circumstance. These would be silly to generally copy. I am sure there is a way forward, just in a different direction to that already travelled and that imagined to be travelled. Sounds like another bit of 'life' taking place. cheers Glen
Chris Shade wrote: > > Glen has a good point, and frankly, I was surprised > that Allan so openly suggested that. > > On the flip side, though, most people (who dont' > already make some of their own preps), won't be in a > position to make good copies of Glen and Greg's > potencies. And if radionic theft is the issue, it > would have always been the issue with any prep. You > just have to figure that your market is those who > aren't radionics or homeophath jockeys and who need > some good preps. > > Wishing you market protection and good will from your > community, > Chris > > --- Glen Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Allan Balliett wrote: > > > > > > > > A question I have for everyone is "Can't Greg's > > remedies be readily > > > propagated infinitely?" Since they are potentized, > > are they not now > > > the 'mother' for endless batches of equal remedy? > > I would think they > > > are, but I'd appreciate insights from you more > > experienced > > > potentizers. Myself, I assume that once you buy a > > unit from Greg, if > > > you don't spill it, you need never purchase > > another, but simply dose > > > your own units from that point on. > > > > This does not necessarily hold to be true. Firstly > > these are compounds > > which when further potentised can change their > > effectiveness and > > secondly potentising develops in waves and so > > further potentising can > > indeed make them less effective. We have definitely > > found that reducing > > the desired application rate leads to reduced > > effect. 'Stealing them' > > thru a radionics device, without changing the > > potency should work within > > that sphere I guess. > > > > This is an opportune moment to bring a thought to > > this discussion. With > > Greg and my potencies ( and thus our lives work) > > being 'potentially' so > > easily stolen from us, what incentive is there for > > us to continue > > working on furthering preparation applications. Why > > would we bother? and > > how are our overheads and life expenses to be > > covered by the community > > benefiting so freely from our work? > > in anticipation of the solution > > Glen > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > http://sports.yahoo.com -- Garuda Biodynamics - for BD Preps, Consultations, Books & Diagrams See our web site @ http://get.to/garuda
