On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Moinak Ghosh <moinakg at belenix.org> wrote:
> Some more observations in this thread:
>
> Well I have been reading up a bunch on the Apt vs Portage stuff and
> it is validating my inclinations to go with Apt more.

Jumping in rather late... I've been a long time portage fan, and
indeed, even used Gentoo for a jukebox system that we built for
someone in the entertainment industry. There was bleeding edge support
for everything.

Gentoo was very very popular at work, most because of the extra high
amount of customizations that one can do with it. Indeed, a
colleague's gentoo box here is much faster than any ubuntu or other
system.

But as of today, there is not a single gentoo user in our company, and
I have deleted our local gentoo mirror.

Reason:
- There is only so much that one can patiently wait for.. emerging for
hours together waiting for a simply ruby executable is something that
a developer cannot tolerate.
- Emerging source over a 128/256 kbps line is even more time in case
of software such as multimedia players, will take even longer time :(

I lurk on the alt-gentoo list and have sometimes tested emerge on
OpenSolaris. too.

But while I love emerge as a techie, I also realize that emerge is not
always end user and bandwidth and CPU friendly (in terms on resources
needed to build).

-- Sriram

Reply via email to