bjornmose schrieb: > Tom M schrieb: > >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:09 PM, bjornmose <bjornm...@gmx.net> wrote: >> . >> >> >>> So I'd like to kindly ask for the permission to remove that wrong view >>> angled, physicists, crappy code. >>> >>> >> Can all of the same use cases be covered with the cloth simulation? >> >> Also how difficult would it be for users to switch their SB >> simulations to use cloth? Can it be done automagically (probably not)? >> >> LetterRip >> >> >> >>> BM >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >> > Neither nor, just taking away freedom <-> adding ease of use .. no > need to decide which module to use .. think about physics .. >
However .. 99.9 % of the users won't need ( or even understand ) all the options there .. ( wild guess 0.001% did ever use ) so taking away the freedom of 0.0000001% of blender users is something i could agree on. > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers