On 05/08/09 09:14, "Gregory Jefferis" <jeffe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2009-05-08 16:23, "Adam R. Maxwell" <amaxw...@mac.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to hear some feedback from the PubMed users on the new parser >> (good, bad, or indifferent). Searching in BD and the DOI lookup >> should use it, I believe. > > It's great to have correctly accented author names, but as implemented so > far this generates very different bibtex for PubMed records. The > deal-breaker is that we get a completely different long format from the > journal name which is not the same as the 'standard' PubMed journal name. Quit BibDesk, set this pref in Terminal, and then see if the information you're looking for is in the Annote field. As long as PubMed provides it, it can be added. defaults write edu.ucsd.cs.mmccrack.bibdesk BDSKAddPubMedXMLStringToAnnote -bool true > I know that everyone hates hidden preferences but I would see this at the > moment as an optional feature. One compromise would be to use XML for > authors only! Using XML for authors only would be madness. Every download request would be made twice, and corresponding entries merged. In addition, that assumes that non-ASCII characters only appear in author names; in my field, I see them all the time in title and abstract, as well. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
