On 05/08/09 09:46, "Christiaan Hofman" <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I see two journal titles. One is the full title, JT in Medline and <Title> in >> XML, and the other is the abbreviated title, TA in Medline and >> <ISOAbbreviation> in XML. Apparently the old parser used the former and the >> new parser uses the latter. > > That should be the opposite, the old parser uses the abbreviation and the new > parser uses the full title. > >> Which one has preference? Or should we include both (though this would >> require some new bibtex field)? >> >> Christiaan > > I saw the following log message, so apparently we decided for the abbreviation > before: > > r13969 | hofman | 2009-01-07 22:46:52 +0100 (Wed, 07 Jan 2009) | 1 line > > use pubmed TA for Journal, as that usually contains a more appropriate value I used the full title from XML because "Applied and environmental microbiology" has more information than TA = "Appl Environ Microbiol". Maybe this is yet another bizarro requirement from the bio world (or bio requirement from bizzaro world?) :). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
