On 05/08/09 10:14, "Gregory Jefferis" <jeffe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-05-08 17:59, "Maxwell, Adam R" <adam.maxw...@pnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/09 09:46, "Christiaan Hofman" <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I see two journal titles. One is the full title, JT in Medline and <Title>
>>>> in
>>>> XML, and the other is the abbreviated title, TA in Medline and
>>>> <ISOAbbreviation> in XML. Apparently the old parser used the former and the
>>>> new parser uses the latter.
>>>
>>> That should be the opposite, the old parser uses the abbreviation and the
>>> new
>>> parser uses the full title.
>>>
>>>> Which one has preference? Or should we include both (though this would
>>>> require some new bibtex field)?
>>>>
>>>> Christiaan
>>>
>>> I saw the following log message, so apparently we decided for the
>>> abbreviation
>>> before:
>>>
>>> r13969 | hofman | 2009-01-07 22:46:52 +0100 (Wed, 07 Jan 2009) | 1 line
>>>
>>> use pubmed TA for Journal, as that usually contains a more appropriate value
>>
>> I used the full title from XML because "Applied and environmental
>> microbiology" has more information than TA = "Appl Environ Microbiol".
>> Maybe this is yet another bizarro requirement from the bio world (or bio
>> requirement from bizzaro world?) :).
>
> Yes I know, I know. The problem is that the full title can look like this
> (for one of the standard journals in my field).
>
> Full: The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of The Society For
> Neuroscience
> MedlineTA: J Neurosci
>
> I've committed a patch to use MedlineTA where available (there could be a
> few records that don't have it (in progress, non-medline)).
I changed this to save the full title in "Journal-Full" when TA is used,
instead of just overwriting it; the Medline parser should have been saving
it as well (with a two-letter tag as field name). Pick another name if it
makes sense.
I also disabled titlecasing by default, since it looks like PubMed uses a
consistent system for that. It's mainly a hack to fix up ALL CAPS TITLES
that ISI uses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
