On 8 May 2009, at 6:59 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > On 05/08/09 09:46, "Christiaan Hofman" <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I see two journal titles. One is the full title, JT in Medline and >>> <Title> in >>> XML, and the other is the abbreviated title, TA in Medline and >>> <ISOAbbreviation> in XML. Apparently the old parser used the >>> former and the >>> new parser uses the latter. >> >> That should be the opposite, the old parser uses the abbreviation >> and the new >> parser uses the full title. >> >>> Which one has preference? Or should we include both (though this >>> would >>> require some new bibtex field)? >>> >>> Christiaan >> >> I saw the following log message, so apparently we decided for the >> abbreviation >> before: >> >> r13969 | hofman | 2009-01-07 22:46:52 +0100 (Wed, 07 Jan 2009) | 1 >> line >> >> use pubmed TA for Journal, as that usually contains a more >> appropriate value > > I used the full title from XML because "Applied and environmental > microbiology" has more information than TA = "Appl Environ Microbiol". > Maybe this is yet another bizarro requirement from the bio world (or > bio > requirement from bizzaro world?) :).
Here was the motivation <https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bibdesk-users&max_rows=25&style=flat&viewmonth=200901&viewday=7 > As you can see from the same user ;-) So what do other pubmed users think? Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
