What a waste of money! For only about ten times more money, they could have eliminated these "wasteful" projects and built a uneeded bypass around a small town, with the additional "benefit" of destroying the commercial district downtown.
On 9/17/09, Jay Otto <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bizarre... > FYI: I found a couple publications put out by the Wisconsin DOT describing > some of the "unnecessary and burdensome" (quote taken from the description > of the ammendment) transportation enhancement projects around Wisconsin. > > 2008 project list: > > http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/localgov/docs/te-grants.pdf > > Transportation Enhancement Projects in Wisconsin, 1993-2004: > > http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/localgov/docs/te-1993-2004.pdf > > Jay > > On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Eric Sundquist wrote: > > There was a floor vote yesterday on an amendment to eviscerate Enhancements > by making the 10 percent set-aside optional in states. It failed, > thankfully, with Kohl opposing. But Feingold voted for it. If you have a > minute to send praise and a complaint, it couldn't hurt. > > Here's the roll call and summary of the amendment: > http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00277 > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org > >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
