On 07/22/10 19:57, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article<mailman.65.1279835965.15649.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
Peter Laws<pl...@ou.edu> wrote:
I have multiple interfaces on my master and multiple interfaces on most of
my slaves.
Is that expected behavior?
Yes. What if the first server stops getting updates, but the second one
does and has a higher serial number? Don't you want the slaves to check
the SOA record on it to pick up these changes?
Except that the 2 "masters" are simply different interfaces on the same
master ... so the serial number *better* always be the same!
Looking at the logs, it appears that the choice of masters is a
second-to-second thing because what I'm seeing is that one zone goes via
one interface and then the next zone, perhaps only a few 10s of ms later,
goes via the other interface.
I would have expected that it would only ask the second-listed master if
the first didn't answer ... but I didn't write the code (and haven't read
it either!
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu. Thank you!
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
