On 2010-07-23 22:52, Peter Laws wrote: > I would have expected that it would only ask the second-listed master if > the first didn't answer ... but I didn't write the code (and haven't > read it either!
And how would your slave ever pick up an update on "second-listed master" that (for whatever reason) doesn't propagate to "the first"? After all, "the first" is still answering, but with old data. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
