In article <[email protected]>, Peter Laws <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/22/10 19:57, Barry Margolin wrote: > > In article<[email protected]>, > > Peter Laws<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I have multiple interfaces on my master and multiple interfaces on most of > >> my slaves. > >> > > > >> > >> Is that expected behavior? > > > > Yes. What if the first server stops getting updates, but the second one > > does and has a higher serial number? Don't you want the slaves to check > > the SOA record on it to pick up these changes? > > Except that the 2 "masters" are simply different interfaces on the same > master ... so the serial number *better* always be the same! That's true in *your* case. But BIND was designed to handle the more general case, where the masters can be different machines. -- Barry Margolin, [email protected] Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
