In article <mailman.83.1279918361.15649.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Peter Laws <pl...@ou.edu> wrote:
> On 07/22/10 19:57, Barry Margolin wrote: > > In article<mailman.65.1279835965.15649.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > > Peter Laws<pl...@ou.edu> wrote: > > > >> I have multiple interfaces on my master and multiple interfaces on most of > >> my slaves. > >> > > > >> > >> Is that expected behavior? > > > > Yes. What if the first server stops getting updates, but the second one > > does and has a higher serial number? Don't you want the slaves to check > > the SOA record on it to pick up these changes? > > Except that the 2 "masters" are simply different interfaces on the same > master ... so the serial number *better* always be the same! That's true in *your* case. But BIND was designed to handle the more general case, where the masters can be different machines. -- Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
