Sukucorp Sukucorp wrote: > If you use DESTDIR approach, you are deviating from the book. If you > are deviating from the book it is assumed that you know what you are > doing. > Is that specifically stated as a policy somewhere (and how much of a "deviation" is installing into DESTDIR to examine the files)? The LFS book discusses package management and even provides an example of using DESTDIR (albeit for symlink style PM). > In case you use the DESTDIR approach, there are specific > post-relocation steps that need to be performed. Just using make > DESTDIR=<some_dir> install is not enough. > No argument there. And the LFS book at least hints at this. > Anyway this point might be moot if LFS starts supporting a package > manager of some sort. That discussion seems to have died down in lfs-dev ...
Joe -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
