On 12/04/25 08:54, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:08:22 +0100 > Victor Wren<[email protected]> wrote: > >> incidentally, I highly recommend Fluxbox as a lightweight WM with a lot >> of potential, and it would be nice to see it included as an option in >> BLFS. > Problem? > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/fluxbox.html > If you like Fluxbox, you might also like Openbox: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/openbox.html > (I used Fluxbox for about 6 months before I discovered Openbox ;) > > Andy
Okay, I know I was feeling buried up to my nose at that point, but I didn't realize I was THAT turned around. That's like waking up and finding your shoes in the freezer. Now I'm not sure which directions I followed. Ah, well, it's working. I'll look into Openbox for the next machine I build up (openbox was not in the BLFS version I last used--2012-1-10). And I see you've dropped Metacity. Primo. Teach me not to look at the SVN before commenting. I notice in the directions, it mentions needing an image viewer for fbsetbg, but none of the utilities it lists (or doesn't list--I'm using feh, which is recommended) are part of the BLFS install, even as an outside "Optional" package. --Victor -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
