On 02/04/14 20:46, Igor Živković wrote: > On 02/04/2014 06:54 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> On 02/04/2014 06:26 PM, Igor Živković wrote: >>> On 2014-02-04 18:18, Armin K. wrote: >>>> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2013/debconf13/webm-high/983_Why_Debian_should_or_should_not_make_systemd_the_default.webm >>>> >>>> >>>> Lennart managed to explain why/why not should Debian (but can be applied >>>> to many other distros) use systemd by default. He got some interesting >>>> points there. Since I noticed that some of you don't really understand >>>> what systemd really does except the binary logs, adding bloat and using >>>> D-Bus, it might be worth to watch. >>> >>> http://wizardofbits.tumblr.com/post/45232318557/systemd-more-like-shit-stemd >>> >>> >> Looks interesting, I'll read it later. I did notice lot of UNIX word >> usage there, so it's natural that people who still "worship UNIX" are >> against systemd. > Not really, people who worship Unix would probably pick one of *BSD. > It's more like that some people aren't happy about their systems slowly > being turned into the systemd monoculture. > Hey who needs sendmail/exim/postfix/dovecot/..... all that confusion just let systemd do it .... soon they will finally implement the currently unimplemented HTCPCP protocol RFC2324. taking Zawinski's law to the next level ....
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2324 [Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0)] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
