Igor Živković wrote: > On 2014-02-04 20:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> systemd is, in many ways, like busybox. It aggregates many programs >> into one. This provides convenience for casual users, but dramatically >> reduces flexibility for users who would be interested in projects like >> LFS/BLFS. > > I don't think it's anything remotely like BusyBox. BusyBox doesn't > reduce your flexibility to pick and choose programs that you wish to > use. I've been playing with it last couple of weeks, mainly using its > mdev and init combined with minirc (https://github.com/hut/minirc). I > can still easily switch to and from eudev/sysvinit/lfs-bootscripts > without recompiling/reinstalling anything.
Perhaps my analogy was wrong. It's just that I don't think the tight integration of many functions is that useful. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
