Em 06-02-2014 14:18, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Igor Živković wrote: >> On 2014-02-04 20:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>> systemd is, in many ways, like busybox. It aggregates many programs >>> into one. This provides convenience for casual users, but dramatically >>> reduces flexibility for users who would be interested in projects like >>> LFS/BLFS. >> >> I don't think it's anything remotely like BusyBox. BusyBox doesn't >> reduce your flexibility to pick and choose programs that you wish to >> use. I've been playing with it last couple of weeks, mainly using its >> mdev and init combined with minirc (https://github.com/hut/minirc). I >> can still easily switch to and from eudev/sysvinit/lfs-bootscripts >> without recompiling/reinstalling anything. > > Perhaps my analogy was wrong. It's just that I don't think the tight > integration of many functions is that useful. > > -- Bruce
I had interpreted Igor's words as "it is much worse that that", not that the analogy was wrong. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
