On 02/04/2014 08:19 PM, Igor Živković wrote: > On 02/04/2014 08:03 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> >> "Now, in Unix system design, it is a generally understood principle that >> a big task not be handled by a big program, but rather a collection of >> small programs, each tackling one specific, well-defined component of >> the larger task. You often hear the phrase “do one thing, and do it >> well” as a guiding principle for writing a Unix program." >> >> While this was true long time ago, today it might not be. Especially for >> consumer programs. > > This is probably the reason for systemd animosity. Consumers can have > GNOME, systemd, PulseAudio and such, just don't take away the option not > to use it from the rest of us. >
While I do fully agree with you, I do think that developers today support the "common use case". It's up to community to support anything else. Freedom of choice has two sides: User choice and developer choice and there's nothing that can really be done about that but complain or fix it yourself in a way that doesn't break the "official" setup. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
