>On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:44:10 -0300 >Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:
> This does not invalidate your comment, but I think it is always good > when a source code becomes open. Even if it did, I would not get particularly upset. The comment I made was pushing the envelope. For me, nouveau does what is expected of it. But for many others it doesn't seem to. Very often there are discussions on blfs-support that go something like this: OP: "Help, I'm trying to use nouveau!" LFSer #1: "Do this." LFSer #2: "Do that." /me: "It works for me, try thus." OP: "Doesn't work." LFSer #1: "Try this #2." LFSer #3: "Try that #2." OP: "Still doesn't work." /me: "Yes it does." OP: "No it doesn't. Giving up." The only sane conclusion that can be drawn is that for some people it doesn't work. Why, I am unable to comment. -- Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih. All of my e-mails are cryptographically signed. Verify them. -- You don't need an AI for a robot uprising. Humans will do just fine.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
