On 25.2.2014 23:54, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Though I strongly disagree with your decision to remove the docs, > the more important part of your commit is removing the work done > by another editor without discussion. Another editor went to the > trouble of adding the instructions to build and install the docs, > and you just decide to remove it because you don't use pdf docs. >
We have seen lot of that lately though and I really feel sorry. Someone wastes the time to get everything to play along as best as possible with everything and then it gots removed/reverted by someone just because "I know better" (no offense) approach even though sometimes it has been explained why something is like it currently is. I wouldn't complain however if the approach worked for all situations, not just the "I use this, everyone should do this" instead of "Lets try to make everyone happy" approach. I did however sometimes remove doc build procedures but only because they didn't work for me (texinfo 5.0 comes to my mind), although they did work for someone else. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
