On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:50 -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > I realize that this post is very old. I'm now playing catch-up. Do > you, by chance, have a reference for that recommendation? I'm preparing > to commit hal-0.5.11 and hal-info-20081022 with only the > udevinfo/udevadm patch. Are there other known issues? I've been using > that combo for some time without _seeing_ any issues, but I'm also not a > heavy consumer, my usb keys work, and input device detection works as > expected for Xorg-7.4. If the developers recommend the RC over patched > stable version, then that would be sufficient for inclusion into the > book. I've drudged through the messages on their mailing list over the > past few months, and have yet to see a specific recommendation of RC > over stable.
Your timing is impeccable - they finally released 0.5.12 yesterday :) Quoting from the release email: it got high time to finally release the current state of hal, since everyone got used to building git head snapshots. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
