Does Firefox build with GTk+3? I assumed it didn't. William Tracy Work: wtr...@cisco.com Play: afishion...@gmail.com Cell phone: (805) 704-0917 Internet phone: (707) 206-6441
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, <al...@verizon.net> wrote: > Mar 21, 2011 10:01:36 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > The apng stuff sounds as if it hasn't changed - although I admit to > > suggesting blfs should go with apng (one of my bad suggestions!), > > firefox has always been happy to build its own patched version. > > Hi Ken, > > Frankly, I've always trusted _my_ stuff better than what Firefox > (of any stripe) provides internally. > Unfortunately, for a quick and dirty solution - which was the case > for me today - there's no such "free lunch" as a little switch > like "--enable-apng" in configure. > Short of that, for the long run, there should be a patch solution for >= > 1.5.1. > > > Thanks for this, I was planning to move to 3.6.15 when I've > > finished migrating my data to my new server, now it looks > > as if I'll be trying 4.0 (on old, or patched, gtk2). > > FWIW, as of today, GTK+ is at 3.0.4. > If you have the time and inclination, I'd suggest you go to > the gtk archive, > mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list > and take a quick look at the March threads, > "GTK+ 2.24.3" and "GTK+-2 Fails on compiling the Documentation branch" > > Might be fun(?) and instructive(?) > > Thanks, > -- Alex > > > > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
