Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:51:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> >> Now to install it on the other current LFS systems on that box - >> looks like I'll probably use it to replace gvolwheel in future, >> > Installed it on all the "still viable" systems on the new box (7.0, > 7.1, and 7.4x2). Fine. Decided I might as well switch over to it > now. Went to my third desktop machine, failed to build on LFS-7.3. > > There is a configure.in patch referenced by arch (I couldn't find > it there, but found a version somewhere else and eventually decided > it wasn't necessary - on 7.4). For LFS-7.3 I need that (it does no > harm in 7.4). Is it worth putting it in -patches ? I'm sure that > it can be achieved with a messy longwinded sed, and for LFS-7.4 it > doesn't seem to be needed. Rediffed version (-p1 instead of -p0, > without the added windoze CRs from the original, and not headed) > attached for comments.
No problem with adding the patch to the repository, but it should have comments that it's for LFS 7.3. > And since pnmixer is objectively better than gvolwheel (it has a > mute toggle, works on the specified default alsa card without any > special initialization) as well as * subjectively * better (gtk+-2 > :-) should I suggest that I archive gvolwheel from the BOOK in > favour of pnmixer ? Or is it so straightforward (building on LFS-7.3 > excepted) and well-known that people will find it for themselves and > not need any guidance ? And there is no problem with archiving gvolwheel and adding pnmixer either. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
