> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:49:17 +0000 (GMT) > From: Richard <r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash > To: akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com>, > BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com> > > Can you list the places where you have got the .so located. Is your system > > 64-bit? > > (I will find the list later when I have the machine) > > This is a 32-bit build on 32 bit hardware (a small, c2008 laptop, the class > of machines that attracted the absurd label of 'netbook'). > > However... I am about to start my next LFS build - which will be 64-bit - so > if there are extra concerns I would be keen to hear about them. >
- meant to add, that if it's just no-pasa with flash+uzbl, then if possible as a fallback-test, build seamonkey/firefox as part of your blfs build (you'll likely have much of the 'Required' infrastructure already, in passing), and per blfs instructions, and verify that flash works ok for you with one/both of those. (Yes, I realise/guess that you perh/prob want uzbl as a bypass of the likes of ff/sm). Or, as an alternate test, can you add flash successfully to a distro that doesn't ship with it per se - e.g. slackware-14.1 . Also, be extra-sure that you do have the 32-bit version for the 32-bit machine (no offence meant in asking); and sim for 64-bit. rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
