>On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:43:45 +0000 >lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:49 +0000 (GMT) > > From: Richard <r_j_humphr...@yahoo.co.uk> > > To: BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> > > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] WebKitGTK-1/Flash
> > I am aware of this and would welcome a viable FOSS alternative. For > > the moment flash remains a necessity. It has been a couple of years > > since I looked at any FOSS flash alternatives - but my recollection > > is that they fell far short of the mark. > > > > ( - so does flash ;) ). > > I see 'lightspark' mentioned quite often; never tried it, or read up > on it. I'll check it out next weekend and report back with the results. > > So, does anybody have any other good ideas? Have I misunderstood > > some vital concept? One vital concept comes to mind: does uzbl understand the format that libflashplayer.so is in? Alternatively, can uzbl use some other plugin files originally compiled and linked for Firefox/Chromium? It has been ages since I last read anything about uzbl and I don't remember anything relating to the answer to the above question. That may be the best direction to try probing for now. *** @akhiezer: I'm cc'ing you in this e-mail because your e-mail (the post to which I am replying) has the Reply-To header field set, with your e-mail in it. I don't normally cc people when posting to the list, so that's why I'm pointing this out like this. -- Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih. All of my e-mails are cryptographically signed. Verify them. -- You don't need an AI for a robot uprising. Humans will do just fine.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
