----- Original Message ----- > From: akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com> ... > - meant to add, that if it's just no-pasa with flash+uzbl, then if possible > as a fallback-test, build seamonkey/firefox as part of your blfs build > (you'll likely have much of the 'Required' infrastructure already, > in passing), > and per blfs instructions, and verify that flash works ok for you with > one/both > of those. (Yes, I realise/guess that you perh/prob want uzbl as a bypass of > the > likes of ff/sm). Or, as an alternate test, can you add flash successfully to > a > distro that doesn't ship with it per se - e.g. slackware-14.1 .
I may try that as an overnight build tonight. Forgive my stupidity - but how is building a gecko-based browser going to assist with diagnosing why webkit cannot use the plugin? R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
