Google Display Ads (GPT specifically) has tried the OT and is satisfied with the feature's behavior. Looking forward to it!
On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 10:06:35 AM UTC-5 Smaug wrote: > On 11/10/22 10:33, 'Arthur Sonzogni' via blink-dev wrote: > > Hi blink-dev, > > > > * > > * > > > > We decided to address issue #5 < > https://github.com/WICG/anonymous-iframe/issues/5>: “rename anonymous > iframe into iframe credentialless”. We will > > rename <iframe anonymous>to <iframe credentialless>. > > > > For this adjustment to take place, the new plan is to ship in M110 > instead of M109. We do not think the origin trial will need to be extended, > since > > partners have been or will be able to test up to M108. Therefore, there > will be a gap between the original trial and launch version. > > > > However, renaming from anonymous to credentialless will not answer > Mozilla's core argument. They believe that the feature would be best > controlled via > > multiple new sandbox flags. > > I don't think anyone from Mozilla has said that. What I have said is that > the current way to control how iframes work is getting very complicated and > the new attribute adds yet another mechanism. And if most of the users > will use both sandbox and credentialless, understanding how those work > together > can be rather confusing. Also, credentialless isn't exposing the > primitives itself, but some unique set of features. I'd rather see > primitives to be > exposed and other features built on top of them. > > > -Olli > > > We think it is much less ergonomic and makes the feature harder to explain > to developers. The integration with sandbox > > flags has challenging open questions around edge cases, as listed in > this document > > < > https://github.com/WICG/anonymous-iframe/blob/main/mozilla-sandbox-proposal.md > >. > > > > * > > * > > > > Considering this, we think the current solution is a better one. We have > feedback from partners that it solves their needs. Considering that we have > > no clear feedback Mozilla would be interested in implementing anonymous > iframes even if they were spelled as sandbox flags, we believe we should > ship > > with what we have implemented. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "blink-dev" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org > > <mailto:blink-dev+...@chromium.org>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAzos5GDYwk7ohTD4Eq2TW43hU%3DrHfXsx2V7%2BVK%3DHdKNd02-TA%40mail.gmail.com > > > < > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAzos5GDYwk7ohTD4Eq2TW43hU%3DrHfXsx2V7%2BVK%3DHdKNd02-TA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > >. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/19690d52-500e-4b40-8899-b2dd5811b11bn%40chromium.org.
