On 4 May 2015, at 11:41, Paolo Valente <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for this extra information and suggestions. Just to be certain that I 
> am not missing anything: I am assuming that also the observed delay you 
> mention is the delay observed from outside endpoints, and not the total delay 
> that one would obtain by adding also the queueing delays inside end points 
> (which, in my case, is one of the unobservable quantities).

Paolo, this is where the difference between ∆Q|G, ∆Q|S and ∆Q|V are important - 
the extraction of the ∆Q|G and ∆Q|S establishes the structural delay, 
differences from that structural delay are caused by the contention for the 
onward transmission resources.

> Il giorno 04/mag/2015, alle ore 12:28, Jonathan Morton 
> <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
>> Generally, the minimum observed delay will correspond to the case when both 
>> inbound and outbound queues are empty throughout the path. This delay should 
>> correspond to basic propagation and forwarding delays, which can't be 
>> reduced further without altering some aspect of the network.
>> 
>> Higher observed delays than this will tend to correspond to one or both of 
>> the buffers at the bottleneck being persistently filled. To work out which 
>> one, you'll need to estimate the network load in each direction. This is of 
>> course easiest if you can see all or most of the traffic passing the 
>> bottleneck link, or if you yourself are participating in that load, but it's 
>> probably possible in some other situations if you get creative.
>> 
>> To determine that bloat is NOT present, you need to observe delays that are 
>> close to the baseline unloaded condition, while also being fairly sure that 
>> the bottleneck link is saturated in the relevant direction.
>> 
>> The most reliable indication of link saturation is to observe ECN marked 
>> packets, which will only normally be produced by an AQM algorithm signalling 
>> link congestion (where both endpoints of the flow have negotiated ECN 
>> support). A slightly less reliable indication of saturation is to observe 
>> lost packets, either via retransmission or ack patterns, especially if they 
>> occur in bursts or at remarkably regular intervals.
>> 
>> - Jonathan Morton
> 
> 
> --
> Paolo Valente                                                 
> Algogroup
> Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica              
> Via Campi, 213/B
> 41125 Modena - Italy                                    
> homepage:  http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/
> 

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to