Hi Andreas, all, [changing the subject to reflect the discussion character]
Andreas Mantke wrote: > >> it is very interesting to read this criteria and compare it with the git > >> log of COOL. It seemed even this Github repo (project) didn't attract > >> the number of volunteers, which are requested in the decision proposal. > > > Just to clarify - the attic decision talks about developers (volunteer or not - should not make a difference). The ESC proposal, on which this is based, considers Online to be of medium complexity. To be able to maintain that code over longer periods of time, 3 developers where deemed necessary. So any comparison should count all commits I guess (that also makes evaluation much easier - just run a git shortlog -n -s). > The last part of this 'communication strategy' reached me in private on > July, 3rd at 7.29pm, when I was told that I should contribute objective > reason / points to the debate around LOOL and the decision about its > atticization for LibreOffice Online. > And thanks for keeping the conversation here constructive indeed. I suspect what happens was adherence to the board communication best practices, which recommends to take bits of the conversation, which are of no particular public interest, private. This is a list with more than 200 subscribers - every not-so-relevant email that people don't need to read, because it wasn't sent to the list (or every email at least without a fullquote), leaves our community more time & energy to do fun & productive work on the project. Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
