on Wed Jan 14 2009, "troy d. straszheim" <troy-AT-resophonic.com> wrote:
> Hi Brad, > > There is a lot to discuss here. I'll go back later and make specific > comments. It'd > be great to talk in person at boostcon, (boostcon rocks, by the way.) > > I understand/agree with a lot of your points (especially bulkiness, and the > need to > reduce the number of toplevel targets), in most cases because I've learned > more about > cmake since I implemented what is currently on the boost trunk. > > Brad King wrote: >> [snip] >> >> In summary, I'd like to help you folks address these issues. Some of >> the work will be in Boost's CMake code and some in CMake itself. The >> work will benefit both projects. We can arrange to meet at BoostCon, >> but we can probably get alot of discussion done on this list before >> then. BTW, can anyone suggest a preferred format for a BoostCon >> session from the boost-cmake-devs' point of view? > > I don't personally see a formal presentation to boost-cmake devs as being > useful, > there just aren't enough of us (last I checked there were three). Who are you counting? I don't think I've done anything substantial with Boost-CMake but would still be *very* interested in such a talk. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
