On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM, David Abrahams <d...@boostpro.com> wrote: > > on Wed Jan 14 2009, "troy d. straszheim" <troy-AT-resophonic.com> wrote: > >> Hi Brad, >> >> There is a lot to discuss here. I'll go back later and make specific >> comments. It'd >> be great to talk in person at boostcon, (boostcon rocks, by the way.) >> >> I understand/agree with a lot of your points (especially bulkiness, and the >> need to >> reduce the number of toplevel targets), in most cases because I've learned >> more about >> cmake since I implemented what is currently on the boost trunk. >> >> Brad King wrote: >>> [snip] >>> >>> In summary, I'd like to help you folks address these issues. Some of >>> the work will be in Boost's CMake code and some in CMake itself. The >>> work will benefit both projects. We can arrange to meet at BoostCon, >>> but we can probably get alot of discussion done on this list before >>> then. BTW, can anyone suggest a preferred format for a BoostCon >>> session from the boost-cmake-devs' point of view? >> >> I don't personally see a formal presentation to boost-cmake devs as being >> useful, >> there just aren't enough of us (last I checked there were three). > > Who are you counting? I don't think I've done anything substantial with > Boost-CMake but would still be *very* interested in such a talk.
Likewise. And I am sure there will be other BoostCon attendees who aren't reading this list who will also be very interested. --Beman _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
