David Abrahams wrote:
on Wed Jan 14 2009, "troy d. straszheim" <troy-AT-resophonic.com> wrote:
Hi Brad,
There is a lot to discuss here. I'll go back later and make specific comments.
It'd
be great to talk in person at boostcon, (boostcon rocks, by the way.)
I understand/agree with a lot of your points (especially bulkiness, and the
need to
reduce the number of toplevel targets), in most cases because I've learned more
about
cmake since I implemented what is currently on the boost trunk.
Brad King wrote:
[snip]
In summary, I'd like to help you folks address these issues. Some of
the work will be in Boost's CMake code and some in CMake itself. The
work will benefit both projects. We can arrange to meet at BoostCon,
but we can probably get alot of discussion done on this list before
then. BTW, can anyone suggest a preferred format for a BoostCon
session from the boost-cmake-devs' point of view?
I don't personally see a formal presentation to boost-cmake devs as being
useful,
there just aren't enough of us (last I checked there were three).
Who are you counting?
I was counting Doug, Michael and myself
I don't think I've done anything substantial with
Boost-CMake but would still be *very* interested in such a talk.
That's good news... I stand corrected. What to you say to the original
question about the preferred format?
-t
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
