troy d. straszheim wrote: > There is a lot to discuss here. I'll go back later and make specific > comments. It'd be great to talk in person at boostcon, (boostcon rocks, > by the way.) > > I understand/agree with a lot of your points (especially bulkiness, and > the need to reduce the number of toplevel targets), in most cases > because I've learned more about cmake since I implemented what is > currently on the boost trunk.
Great. I'll wait for your specific comments to continue discussion. > Brad King wrote: >> In summary, I'd like to help you folks address these issues. Some of >> the work will be in Boost's CMake code and some in CMake itself. The >> work will benefit both projects. We can arrange to meet at BoostCon, >> but we can probably get alot of discussion done on this list before >> then. BTW, can anyone suggest a preferred format for a BoostCon >> session from the boost-cmake-devs' point of view? > > I don't personally see a formal presentation to boost-cmake devs as > being useful, there just aren't enough of us (last I checked there > were three). I'd suggest we just sit down together... there are > plenty of conference rooms available at all times. Sure. We can look at the conference schedule when it is available and choose a time to meet. > The boost-cmake-for-users talk could of course reflect whatever we > get done between now and then. Has anyone submitted anything for this yet? We (Kitware) can present our CMake/CTest/CDash/CPack software process in general, but the boost-specific part should probably be done by one of its authors or maintainers. Do you want to do a combined (two-part) session, or should I submit a separate proposal for the general part? -Brad _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
