Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is a trivial change to fix this (just take out the check), and I've > done this in my own copy. I'm attaching a patch with this email.
I support this change. I also think it's an indicator that it might be worth rethinking and clearly defining the meaning of "portable generic path". -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
