David Abrahams wrote:
>
> Sure; I just don't want to have to be explicit about anything just to
> say "I'm doing native path manipulation", since I believe that's the
> 90% case. I don't want to be stopped by irrelevant portable path
> considerations nor uglify my code to avoid it.
I agree except that IMO the 90+% case is "I'm doing generic path
manipulation" which is portable path format ("x/y", not "x\y" or "x:y") but
no constraints on charset except of course '/' and '\0'.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
