"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> >> Sure; I just don't want to have to be explicit about anything just to >> say "I'm doing native path manipulation", since I believe that's the >> 90% case. I don't want to be stopped by irrelevant portable path >> considerations nor uglify my code to avoid it. > > I agree except that IMO the 90+% case is "I'm doing generic path > manipulation" which is portable path format ("x/y", not "x\y" or "x:y") but > no constraints on charset except of course '/' and '\0'.
Works for me. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost