Are we back to this, again?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 03:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World
> 
> 
> At 17:45 04-10-2002 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> 
> >>And if you remember that, then you will also remember that 
> since that
> >>time, the policy of this list is that nobody is required to 
> back any 
> >>claims with any proof.
> >
> >Now, I may have been deleting e-mails en masse, but for the 
> record, to 
> >my
> >knowledge this has not in any way EVER been official policy 
> here on the 
> >Brin-L list.  I have seen no memo changing the nature of the 
> etiquette 
> >guidelines in such a manner.  This is a conclusion you drew 
> about the 
> >list, and as far as I can tell it applies to only one 
> incident.  If you 
> >disagree with me, please post the relevant section of the etiquette 
> >guidelines that says that '.the policy of this list is that 
> nobody is 
> >required to back any claims with any proof' . Otherwise, you're 
> >wrong.  It's not list policy.
> >Please acknowledge your error publicly or prove I'm wrong by 
> posting the 
> >relevant section of the etiquette guidelines.
> 
> The fact that it is not in the Etiquette Guidelines does not 
> mean it is not 
> list policy. Erik Reuter consistently refused to back his claims with 
> proof. This community did not criticise him for his blatant 
> refusal to 
> provide proof. I have since then repeated my statement on a 
> few occassions, 
> and nobody has ever disputed it. Therefore, the community has 
> given it her 
> silent approval.
> 
> <Nitpick>
> BTW, there is also nothing in the Guidelines that says that 
> claims must be 
> supported by proof.
> </Nitpick>
> 
> 
> >>>Oh, and by the way, if you feel inclined, I'd really love 
> to see you
> >>>provide further documentation that the authors and 
> publishers of the 
> >>>eight dictionaries whose definitions were posted to the 
> list are biased 
> >>>and members of the "pro-Israel" crowd.
> >>
> >>Certainly in the case of American authors and publishers, 
> such a bias
> >>cannot be entirely ruled out. America in general is, after 
> all, very 
> >>pro-Israel, has a large Jewish community, and is in fact 
> the only friend 
> >>Israel has in the world.
> >
> >Show me the sources and documentation that back up your claims.
> 
> I am not saying they *are* biased, I am saying that the 
> possibility can not 
> be ruled out (and have given the reasons why). It is not 
> possible to prove 
> that the *possibility of bias* does or does not exist.
> 
> 
> Jeroen "Likud Delenda Est" van Baardwijk
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Wonderful-World-of-Brin-L Website:                   
> http://www.Brin-L.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Reply via email to