> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:jxg9@;po.cwru.edu] > > At 02:07 PM 11/1/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote: > >Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not, > which ones would? > > Virtually every country under consideration for a permanent > UNSC seat in > the future has stated that they would decline the permanent > seat if it did > not carry the same rights and privileges as every other > permanent seat.
As Jim said earlier, wouldn't that make it next to impossible to get anything done on the UNSC? I can't imagine almost any even remotely controversial proposal not being vetoed by one of that group? - jmh _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
