<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><01df01c2a0d0$86d457e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<028101c2a13d$8ef9ae80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Discussions of the writings of science fiction/futurist authors
David Brin and Gregory Benford. <brin-l.mccmedia.com>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Minette wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Internet Free Speech struck down by Australian court
>
> > Dan Minette wrote:
> >
> > > What are the odds on the New York Times winning their case? Slim and
> None,
> > > and Slim is heading out the door.
> >
> > <nitpick>
> >
> > It's not the NYT, it's Dow Jones, publisher of the Wall Street Journal
> > and Barron's. Totally different animals.
>
> <nitpick right back>
> I was referring to a hypothetical article about the Saudi royal family.
> The NYT hypothetically published that article. :-)
Oh, OK.
Care to give chances on Dow Jones winning their non-hypothetical case?
:)
Julia
p.s. if anyone wants to know what the opinion of Dow Jones is on this,
go to http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002754
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
