> From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jan Coffey wrote: > > >--- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s881312.htm > > > > > > > > Colour vision means pheromones unnecessary > > > > Tuesday, 17 June 2003 > <snipped much> > > > >Simply becouse one sense is more importatnt than > > other doesn't necisarily > > >mean that the other does not still play a part. > > > > > > My main thought when I read the article was that if > > human females _did_ > > have an area of skin which changed color in order to > > signal to males that > > they were, ahem, "receptive", the fashion and > > cosmetics industries would > > have long since taken full advantage of the fact... > > <shudders> > Perish that thought! Although I think there *is* > something to lipstick as a signaler, otherwise we'd > just use neutral chapstick...
http://employees.csbsju.edu/lmealey/hotspots/Chapter13.htm _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
