Personally, I favor the idea of gay marriage.  From my perspective, it
strengthens the concept of marriage by extending it.  By accepting, one
broadens the acknowledgement of the lifetime commitment made by two people
(yea I know the commitment is often broken).  Different types of families
are affirmed in their commitment to be a family; and to live a life that
intimately involves others.

Having said that, I acknowledge that this is a radical redefinition of
marriage.  I cannot think of a society without marriage or with same sex
marriages being common.  One of the reasons is that, while marriage has
involved politics and business, the very foundation has been the care of
children.  A woman would have children by one man, and that man will
provide for those children.  In addition, the man saw often saw himself
living on in his sons.

Redefining this requires people to redefine their most important
relationship.  It, quite literally, strikes home.  It is not surprising
that resistance would be found to such a fundamental redefinition.

In addition, I've been meditating on the difference between gay civil
unions and gay marriages.  If the civil unions give all the rights and
privileges of marriage, then the difference is the blessing of society on
the union.   I strongly believe that gay people have the right to choose a
partner that they share everything with and who is designated as having the
final say as to what their best interests are if they are incapacitated.
But, I don't really think the approval of society is a right.  I think it
is a darn good idea, but not a right.

So, I would suggest that, for now, the state approval of civil unions
guarantee rights for gays is the best way to go.  Religious marriages can
add the affirmation of community to this; and I also support that.  For
those who are not religious, there could still be a community  ceremony
that affirms the union.  My hope would be that, after years of folks
knowing that nice gay couple down the street, society could honestly give
its general affirmation, and the gay civil unions would be acknowledged as
marriages by society as a whole.

But, I don't think we're there yet; and saying we are would just be a lie.
Further, it would also be a distraction from real attacks on the American
families. I do think there are trends in the US now that are anti-family
and that are dangerous to society....the most important of which is the
increased social acceptability of men abandoning the responsibility they
have towards their children.

Dan M,


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to